EV charging — Shoreline operator POC (Level 2)¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Status | Archived — killed (2026-05-03). Decision: churn-to-return ratio too high after stress-test. Even at median assumptions the economics (~$50–$100/mo net per charger) don't justify the capital, 80–150 hrs Year 1 owner time, and illiquidity vs preserving equity positions. Capital stays in existing stocks. |
| Scope | Level 2 AC charging (same class as Tesla Wall Connector / overnight stall charging — not DC fast / Supercharger network) |
| Geography | Shoreline, WA (primary); Seattle metro context |
| Parent | projects/operator-agent |
| Ops agent | crusty — remote telemetry (uptime, revenue, alerts), automated billing workflows |
Standalone file-of-record for the Operator Agent proof-of-concept after vending was set aside: EV L2 is the chosen first physical automation node — remote visibility, semi-passive after ~12 months of active setup (site scouting, landlord negotiation, permits, install coordination estimated at 80–150 hrs Year 1) vs weekly vending restocks. "Under 2 hrs/month" is the steady-state target, not the Year 1 reality.
Why this path¶
- Vending / micro-market rejected for Node 1: requires weekly physical restocking (~1–3 hrs), poor fit for "full automation" and Crusty-driven ops cadence.
- EV Level 2 selected as the better first node: largely unattended after install; remote telemetry (uptime, revenue, alerts) via projects/crusty-integrable APIs; app-based payments; under 2 hrs/month human touch at steady state vs vending's weekly haul.
- Aligns with 90-day priority: a physical automation anchor with semi-passive income after Year 1 plus real operator reps (permits, landlord, utilities, network apps). Year 1 owner time (site scouting through first charger live) is estimated 80–150 hrs and does not appear in any payback figure.
- Tech overlap: same charging class as existing Tesla Wall Connector mental model (overnight L2, not DC fast/Supercharger).
Target market¶
| Tier | Segment | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | Multifamily apartments / condos in Shoreline | Renters ~60% of Seattle-area EV owners; many lack garages / home plugs. Overnight L2 for ~20–30 mi/day commuting is the core job. Competition still thin — only ~5% of multifamily properties offer chargers (scout-level figure; verify per deal). |
| Secondary (if multifamily saturates or as parallel tests) | Workplaces, office parks, retail / grocery pads, gyms (e.g. Uplift) | Same utilization story: dwell-time charging, not impulse retail. |
Demand scouting: PlugShare (and similar) visibility plus foot-traffic patterns before signing.
Economics (savings-funded + stacked grants)¶
Rough planning band — re-quote everything before commit. The spreadsheet must be built before first landlord conversation — the figures below have a known internal inconsistency (see note) and are placeholders only.
| Line | Detail |
|---|---|
| Install cost per L2 charger | $3.5k–$15k before incentives |
| Seattle City Light grants | Up to 50% (or $25k/site cap) → net ~$3k–$7.5k/charger in favorable cases; grant timeline 6–18 months, not guaranteed — model without it first |
| Network platform fee | $15–30/port/month or 10–20% of revenue (SWTCH, ChargePoint, AmpUp, etc.) — frequently omitted from early models; materially reduces net |
| Revenue/charger (illustrative — 10–15% daily utilization, ~$0.40/kWh retail, 7.2 kW EVSE) | ~$2,500–$3,800/year gross |
| Net profit (after power ~$0.20/kWh + network fee + repairs reserve) | ~$50–$100/mo per charger at median steady state — ⚠️ NOT $250–$300/mo (see note below) |
| Payback | ~5–8 years at median; ~3 years only if grants are captured AND utilization sustains 20%+ — do not use 3-year figure in planning until spreadsheet validates it |
| ROI framing | 15–25% annualized at median; aggressive models (grants + high utilization) could reach 30–40% — the 30–100% figure was derived from an inconsistent net number and should not be used |
| Scale vision | 12–16 chargers across 3–4 sites → ~$1–2k/mo net at median (portfolio-level spreadsheet TBD — revise upward only when unit economics are confirmed) |
| Liquidity angle | Exit / resale: used equipment often 60–80% of install cost depending on buyer market — verify before banking on it |
⚠️ Economics note (2026-05-03): The earlier $250–$300/mo net figure does not reconcile with the stated gross revenue and cost inputs. A 7.2 kW charger at 12% utilization produces ~$3,000/year gross; after power cost (~$1,525), network fees (~$420–$900), and repairs reserve (~$500), median net is ~$50–$100/mo per charger, not $250–$300. The higher figure requires ~35–40% utilization — top-decile performance for mature sites, not a realistic Year 1 assumption. Build the actual spreadsheet before committing capital.
Rates & utilization: both electricity tariffs and session pricing drift — model sensitivity runs are mandatory before final go/no-go. Watch for demand charge exposure: simultaneous evening charging at multiple ports can trigger SCL demand charges that raise effective power cost above $0.20/kWh.
Recommended start sequence¶
- Fund from new savings only — do NOT sell appreciated stocks. Selling appreciated equity triggers 15–20% LTCG tax drag before a dollar is invested, and the opportunity cost vs a diversified equity portfolio (realistic 10–13% annualized, not 7%) is only recovered if this venture hits the upper quartile of utilization. At median performance (~$50–$100/mo per charger), liquidating stocks to fund this is a net-negative financial decision. Use new savings; preserve equity positions.
- Landlord / PM deal shape: default flat access fee only if needed; avoid heavy rev-share unless unavoidable — ≤10% acceptable if it unlocks a strong site.
- Lead with one Shoreline multifamily site sized for 3–4 chargers from day one (shared feeders / panels → lower marginal cost per port). Single-charger economics are weak; shared infrastructure is the single biggest economic lever available.
- Permitting: mayor/network intro framed as shortening a typical multi-month permit/interconnect slog — treat as accelerator, not a guarantee.
Ops & maintenance (Crusty-friendly)¶
| Cadence | Work |
|---|---|
| Monthly | Visual / physical spot-check — Crusty can prompt via API-driven alerts |
| Quarterly | Remote firmware / vendor app updates |
| Repairs reserve | ~$500/year thrown off for rare truck rolls |
| Cash & power | Billing and settlement flows through charger-network apps (SWTCH, Tesla for Business, ChargePoint ecosystem, etc.) — aim for no manual invoicing. Note: network app is a dependency risk; switching platforms mid-deployment requires hardware reconfiguration and possible re-permitting. |
Gotchas / risks¶
| Risk | Mitigation sketch |
|---|---|
| Permits + electrical upgrades | Grants + streamlined utility path; relationships; pad timeline by 6–12 months minimum |
| Utilization misses | PlugShare scouting + pick buildings with plausible renter EV density; verify actual EV penetration of target building, not just metro-wide stats |
| Utility rate shocks + demand charges | Pass-through tariff math in leases/apps; diversify sites; model demand charge exposure explicitly for multi-port sites |
| No Tesla Supercharger path | Tesla-owned network is closed — this model is open L2 / third-party OCPP-style stacking, not Supercharger resale |
| Landlord / property turnover | Equipment is bolted to their building; lease must cover equipment removal rights and early-exit terms. Property sale or PM change can kill a site. Get legal review of access agreement before signing. |
| Competitive encroachment | Large networks (ChargePoint, SWTCH, Blink) offer free equipment to landlords in exchange for revenue share — they may sign your target building before you do. Pipeline must be 5+ candidates, not 1. |
| Building electrical capacity | Older multifamily stock may need a utility service upgrade ($15k–$50k), not just a subpanel. Confirm with an electrician before any site negotiation. |
| Network platform concentration | All billing, session data, and driver identity lives in one vendor's app. Repricing or platform exit wipes margin. Prefer OCPP-compatible hardware to preserve optionality. |
| Grant timeline and certainty | SCL EV rebate program is competitive and bureaucratic; approval can take 6–18 months or be unavailable. Model base case without grants; treat capture as upside. |
| Insurance / liability | EV charging fires are rare but real. Confirm operator E&O/liability coverage before first install; add to cost model. |
| Driver support never fully automates | Charger faults, billing disputes, and blocked stalls generate contacts Crusty can triage but not fully resolve. Budget a small ongoing support surface. |
Long-term outlook (≈10 years)¶
- Regional EV adoption still compounding (often cited ~15–40% annual growth bands in forecasts through ~2036 — verify sources before citing externally).
- Robotaxis / high-mileage fleets could raise multifamily dwell-time charging needs (constant overnight top-ups), not shrink them — speculative but directionally bullish for stall hours.
- Once installed and permitted, behaves like sticky infrastructure revenue vs high-touch retail.
- Primary justification is the learning vehicle, not the income alone: operator reps + Crusty-on-real-P&L experience is hard to replicate from theory and directly advances the Operator Agent thesis regardless of whether unit economics beat index funds.
Related¶
- projects/operator-agent — umbrella thesis + archived vending sprint notes
- projects/crusty — telemetry, alerts, scheduled digests, future settlement reconciliation skills
- What-Im-Working-On — snapshot priority
- index, log, Grok-Brief